Department of Justice

Tasmanian Industrial Commission

www.tas.gov.au
Contact  |  Accessibility  |  Disclaimer

T2688

 

TASMANIAN INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

Industrial Relations Act 1984
s.23 application for award or variation of award

National Union of Storeworkers, Packers, Rubber and Allied Workers'
Tasmania Branch

(T.2688 of 1990)

and

The Federated Miscellaneous Workers Union of Australia
Tasmanian Branch

Tasmanian Confederation of Industries

FIBREGLASS AND PLASTICS AWARD

 

COMMISSIONER R J WATLING

20 December 1990

Wage rates - State Wage Case Nov 1989 - Structural Efficiency Principle - Second Stage - Application granted 4 December 1990

REASONS FOR DECISION

This application was made by the National Union of Storeworkers, Packers, Rubber and Allied Workers', Tasmanian Branch, for the purpose of varying the Fibreglass & Plastics Award to reflect the second Structural Efficiency increase pursuant to the Structural Efficiency Principles.

By way of a well presented submission and exhibits, Mr. Richardson of the National Union of Storeworkers, Packers, Rubber and Allied Workers', Tasmanian Branch took the Commission through the following:

(1) Background information,

(2) Proposed new classification.structure,

(3) Proposed relativities,

(4) Translation from existing to proposed classification structure,

(5) Wage increase - broadbanding and second Structural Efficiency increase,

(6) Decision and Orders in respect of the Rubber, Plastic and Cablemaking Industry (consolidated) Award, 1983,

(7) Facilitative provisions,

(8) ACTU code of conduct for 12 hour shift work,

(9) Training,

(10) Minimum rates adjustment.

In respect to the proposed new classification structure, it was the parties agreed position that they would be trialled over the next 6 months and depending on the results, they would seek a further hearing of this application to place them in the award.

The classification structure (for which definitions were supplied) to be tested along with their relativities to each other are as follows:

 

 

CLASSIFICATION

RELATIVITY
        %

     

MP1-

Manufacturing/Production

        78

 

Employees Level 1

 
     

MP2-

Manufacturing/Production

        82

 

Employee Level 2

 
     

MP3-

Manufacturing/Production

        87.4

 

Employee Level 3

 
     

MP4-

Manufacturing/Production

        92.4

 

Employee Level 4

 
     

MP5-

Manufacturing/Production

        97

 

Employee Level 5

 
     

MP6-

Manufacturing/Production

       100

 

Employee Level 6

 
     

T1-

Tradesperson Level 1

       100

     

T2-

Tradesperson Level 2

       105

     

T3-

Tradesperson Level 3

       110

     

T4-

Tradesperson Special Class

       115

     

T5-

Advanced Tradesperson Level 1

       125

     

T6-

Advanced Tradesperson Level 2

       130

Notes:

(a) Relativities subject to testing and phasing in of minimum rate adjustments.

(b) Consideration to be given to integration of supervisory and technical grades within proposed classification structure.

As an initial step the parties expressed a desire to broadband the existing award classifications identified in attachment "A".

In addition to the proposed new classification structure and flexibilities that will hopefully flow as a consequence of it's gradual introduction in tandem with structured training, the parties agreed to several facilitative measures designed to promote efficiencies at the workplace as well as continue the process encapsulated in the structural efficiency principle.

These measures include:

    - ability to commence 12 hour shift operations for continuous shift workers;

    - some flexibility in the taking and timing of annual leave (which will be addressed more fully in this decision);

    - increasing options open to an employer and his/her employees in respect of the payment of wages;

    - training and training leave;

    - consultative mechanisms at the workplace level of industry;

    - enterprise agreements;

    - ATS traineeships.

Having considered the material presented by the parties I am satisfied that the award should be varied in the manner sought.

The package along with the ongoing programme is sufficient to warrant the second structural efficiency increase in accordance with the principles. I note the testing of the classification structure will be completed by the end of June 1991.

That being the case I would expect the parties to report back to the Commission after that time.

On the day of the hearing I informed the parties that the operative date of the decision would be the first full pay period to commence on or after the 4 December, 1990. I now confirm that position.

The Orders giving effect to this decision are attached.

 

R J Watling
COMMISSIONER

Appearances:
Mr P Richardson with Mr D Strickland for the National Union of Storeworkers, Packers, Rubber and Allied Workers', Tasmania Branch.
Ms P Shelley for the Federated Miscellaneous Workers Union of Australia, Tasmanian Branch.
Mr S Clues for the Tasmanian Confederation of Industries.

Date and place of hearing:
1990
Hobart
December 4
December 19