T2425, T2529, T3458, T3459 - 29 October
TASMANIAN INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Industrial Relations Act 1984 Australasian Society of Engineers, Federated Clerks Union of Australia, Transport Workers' Union of Australia, Metals and Engineering Workers' Union AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES AWARD
Wage rates - State Wage November 1989 - Structural Efficiency Principle - second stage REASONS FOR DECISION All these applications, which were eventually joined for hearing, were for the second Structural Efficiency Principle (SEP) 3% increase to be applied to the Automotive Industries Award (the Award). Ultimately there were quite a number of matters agreed between the parties, but there were also some not agreed. This situation apparently followed a number of periods of negotiation at which it had been very difficult to get agreement between all parties. The unions produced an exhibit which contained award amendment items they considered appropriate and sufficient for the granting of the increase. The Tasmanian Confederation of Industries (the Confederation) confirmed the agreed items as follows:
Having confirmed the agreed items the Confederation went on to explain reasons why some items in the Unions' exhibit were not acceptable. In this context the Confederation had the green to itself, as it were, in that the unions had not identified the matters disagreed nor had they sought to explain why their proposals as to those disagreed matters should be preferred. I will deal specifically with the disagreed parts only and make no reference to those parts of the disagreed items which were agreed. 1. Hours - (Conditions - Divisions A, B and G) The Confederation sought the addition of a proviso paragraph in subclause (e) in the following terms:
I accept the Confederation's submissions: this is not an unprecedented provision (for example it is to be found in the (Federal) Metal Industry Award 1984) and in any case its application or otherwise will still be subject to agreement between the parties. I believe it is well within the scope and intention of the current Principles; this paragraph will be added to the rest of the Hours of Work clause already agreed. 2. Hours (Conditions - Divisions C and D) The spread of hours presently prescribed for employees covered by Divisions C and D is between 7.00 am and 6.00 pm. The Confederation sought to change the spread to between 6.00 am and 6.00 pm on the basis that such was consistent with the other Divisions of the Award. Again, I accept the Confederation's submissions: this is not an unprecedented prescription and I believe consistency between the Award Divisions is desirable subject to any serious objections. No reasonable objections were raised at the hearing. Divisions C and D will be varied to provide a spread of hours between 6.00 am and 6.00 pm. 3. Holidays with Pay (Conditions - All Divisions) The Confederation sought the addition of a new subclause as follows:
Again, I accept the Confederation's submissions: this also is not an unprecedented prescription, although it does have wider effect than the equivalent prescriptions in both the (Federal) Metal Industry Award 1984 and the (Federal) Vehicle Industry - Repair, Services and Retail Award 1980. The Award will be varied in the manner sought by the Confederation so as to apply to all Divisions. I believe these three proposals by the Confederation are well within the meaning and the spirit of the on-going implementation of the SEP. They will provide much greater flexibility in everyday operations. I am satisfied that the parties to the Award have cooperated positively in a fundamental review of the Award and are implementing measures to improve the efficiency of industry. The Award will be amended in the manner agreed and additionally in the manner I have decided for those items not agreed. The operative date of all these amendments will be the first full pay period commencing on or after 29 October 1991. An order will issue in due course.
P A Imlach Appearances Date and place of hearing: |