T6264
TASMANIAN INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Industrial Relations Act 1984 Health Services Union of Australia, DISABILITY SERVICE PROVIDERS AWARD
Award variation - third $8 arbitrated safety net adjustment - allowances - consent matter - application granted - operative date ffpp 24.7.96 REASONS FOR DECISION The applicant in these proceedings is the Health Services Union of Australia, Tasmania No. 1 Branch. The union seeks to vary the Disability Service Providers Award to reflect the third $8 Safety Net Adjustment, recently confirmed by the State Wage Case decision of 24 July 1996. The application does not concern itself with allowances. The employee organisations that have an award interest in this matter are: Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) The application proceeded by way of consent, HSUA submitting and ASU and TCCI agreeing that, at award level:
Paragraph 7.3.2.3 of the Wage Fixing Principles, as determined by the recent State Wage Case Full Bench decision, requires that: "... the parties commit to review the award in the context of:- (i) consistent award formatting; In the case of the award now before me, each of the employee organisations named above specifically commit themselves to undertaking the required review. Although, strictly speaking, the question of varying allowances that relate to work or conditions does not arise in this case, I granted leave to Mr Fitzgerald of the Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry Limited to make a statement concerning the agreement between his organisation and the Tasmanian Trades and Labour Council on the matter. Mr Fitzgerald said the peak organisations agree that, in the case of each of the three Arbitrated Safety Net Adjustments, the particular $8 increase, as a proportion of the base tradesman's rate applicable at the time, represents the following percentages for the purpose of adjusting allowances: First Adjustment 1.92% The peak organisations also agree that the cumulative effect of the above movements is 5.75%. I believe the submissions and expressions of agreement put to me and recorded above fully satisfy the requirements of the current Wage Fixing Principles. Accordingly, I will vary the award in the manner sought by the applicant, with effect from the first full pay period to commence on or after 24 July 1996. My order, in that form, will follow shortly.
B.R. Johnson Appearances: Date and Place of Hearing: 1 Except for Summit Industries, where the operative date was the first full pay period to commence on or after 22 May 1995. |